A whitewash, or a fresh Cote of paint?

November 1, 2010 § 9 Comments

So, excitement. Four elections over the weekend. Let’s do the most straightforward ones first.

Brazil went to Lula’s PT’s Dilma Rousseff as expected. However, I at least, was expecting a more emphatic victory than she got. She ended up picking up 9% more votes than in the first round to win with 56%. Meanwhile the Social Democrats candidate – Serra – picked up a further 11% to reach 44%. Part of the reason was that whilst the right – such as it is – were happy to back Serra the left were deeply deeply deeply deeply deeply (update, apparently not that deeply – see comments) split on whether to support Rousseff. Anyway, hats off to the first ever female President of Brazil.

Rousteff

Niger has voted on its constitution but it looks like it will be Wednesday or Thursday before we know the result. It will almost certainly be a yes vote by around 90% but it looks like turnout could be lower than the 70% the ruling junta was hoping for. This is because a number of leading Sufi Pirs (the most influential clerics in the country) have called on people to boycott the referendum as one of the changes is the formalisation of the separation of church and state.

Again, we might have to wait for presidential elections later in the year before we see how genuine the junta’s desire to give up power and return to civilian rule is. However, they gave out a promising signal on Sunday when they said that none of the junta’s leadership were intending to contest the upcoming elections. There’s some more background here.

The status quo was retained in Bahrain, and the anti monarchy coalition I posited here did not come to pass (there’s more background on the Bahrain page – which I will update later today) but that was not the real story of the night.

The results are the worst ever for secular parties in Bahrain – every single one of the 40 seats went to religious parties. They were also a disappointment for the Shia opposition who once again fell two seats short of a majority. However every single opposition seat is held by one party – the Shia Al Wefaq.

Which brings us to the main story: whilst Sunni members loyal to the monarchy did win a majority, the actual Sunni pro-monarchy parties were absolutely devastated as independents ran riot. The leading governing party Al Alsalah won only 3 seats (a loss of 5) whilst the Salafi Al Menbar won only 2 (also a loss of 5). Vaguely pro-monarchy Sunni independents amassed 17 seats (an increase of 10).

Bahrain parties

So when I said the status quo was retained, that was a little simplistic. Sunni pro-monarchy members are the majority, but they are totally split, their political parties have been, drubbed and the largest party (by a factor of 6!) is the Shia opposition. Last time round four of the seven independents banded together into a bloc called “the Future Bloc” for greater bargaining power. If they could persuade a few more to do the same this time they could easily form the new government without ever having stood under a platform and without anyone really knowing anything about them.

Alternately Al Alsalah and Al Menbar might be able to tempt some of the new independents over into their column and we might end up with something similar to the previous government. Otherwise we look set for an Al Alsalah/Al Menbar coalition government despite the fact that they only got five seats between them. The Coalition would also not have a single seat in the Capital (which Al Wefaq almost swept) or the south (which independents did sweep).

Of course the one group which will be delighted with all this is the creepingly authoritarian Monarchy who are likely to continue to pull all the strings.

Last, but certainly not least is the Cote d’Ivoire. Sadly we won’t get any results until Wednesday at the earliest (I’ll do a Cote d’Ivoire and Niger update later in the week)  but that they have happened at all is news in itself. Remember this was the eighth attempt to hold the poll. I previewed the elections last week.

So far it has been reasonably peaceful, and the UN mission says they are satisfied with security arrangements and think the poll will be “credible”. Gbangbo’s supporters have accused foreigners of using false documents to vote for the opposition – but this is to be expected as many of Gbangbo’s supporters view the entire north of the country (which is Muslim as opposed to the Christian south, and has large numbers of seasonal workers from Central Africa living in it) as being inhabited by foreigners. So far $400 million has been spent on determining who is Ivorian and who isn’t – leading some to call it the most expensive election in the world – however as the issue is more political than one of passports that will not be the end of the matter.

Turnout seems to be quite high -60% – which is a good sign, and the UN are congratulating themselves on the success of their “Drogba” campaign:

Drogba

There are some nice pictures from polling day here. African Elections (an NGO) will tweet the results as they come in on their account @cotedivoirevote

Advertisements

Tagged: , , ,

§ 9 Responses to A whitewash, or a fresh Cote of paint?

  • glhermine says:

    I think you put way too much emphasis on the alleged division of the “left”. Aside from the PV, which is not actually left-wing, the other parties you indirectly mention (PSOL, PSTU and PCB) are totally irrelevant (though the PSOL is slightly on the verge of being of some relevance). Lula’s centrist policies have alienated the old sectarian far-left and those people, who are more endangered than Brazilian Natives, are totally irrelevant in the wide realm of things. The only reason Heloisa Helena did well in 2006 was because she was a) well-known and b) a well-liked women and whistleblower in the mensalao (and unlike Roberto Jefferson she wasn’t involved in it). Corruption was a major issue for educated well-off urban Brazilians in 2006 (and not in 2010). Nobody cared about what the PSTU or PCB had to say about this thing. It likely came as a shock to many that the PCB still actually existed! The left which matters, however, was not very divided (the PT was not at all because Lula’s word is God) and the small divisions within left-wing PT allies like the PSB and PDT were quickly bridged months ago and everybody was happy.

    Whilst not left-wing, the PMDB was obviously divided on the surface (though the majority and the leadership went Dilma, state wings supported Serra – see Jarbas in PE and the PMDB in places like SC and RS); the entire party knows better than showing those divisions and instead plays a game of making people forget these divisions.

    Arguably, the PSDB had more divisions – thought not apparent – with a rivalry between Serra and Aecio Neves with the latter arguably doing what he could to ensure Serra lost. Then you had the case (see Teo Vilela in Alagoas) of PSDB candidates hiding their links with Serra lest it hurts them.

    daymn, that was long. Sorry.

  • Don’t apologise! I’m delighted for the information. My Portuguese is non existent and a lot gets lost in (google) translation.

  • Oh and the deeply’s were more of an excuse to add in all the links really

  • Rumours are starting to circulate that there’ll be a second round between Gbangbo and Ouattara in the Cote d’Ivoire

  • World Elections comprehensive coverage of Brazil’s round 2 is here: http://welections.wordpress.com/2010/11/02/brazil-2010-runoff/

  • Most exciting election result of the day http://bbc.in/cbOZBT it’s Gbagbo vs Ouattara and It’s going to round two. 35% all by all accounts. A real surprise. Given Bedie’s supporters would much prefer Outtara we could really have an upset here

  • KiteZA says:

    Great analysis! Thanks for pointing me over here.
    Enjoyed reading the post and the comments.

    Tchau

  • […] Elections wrote more about the ethnic aspect here, I also added some stuff on the Drogba campaign here. The first round was fascinating, and provided a surprise second place for Ouattara over […]

  • […] in Saudi Arabia and Mauritania. In addition Bahrain (which I wrote about here, here, and here) is clearly worried enough about the issue (or maybe just wanting to build some new alliances) to […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading A whitewash, or a fresh Cote of paint? at Who rules where.

meta

%d bloggers like this: